Why CDS Hooks Matters Now

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are now ubiquitous across healthcare systems. In Europe, 84% of countries in the WHO European region use EHRs routinely in primary care, with 78% doing so in secondary care.¹ At the European Union level, the Digital Decade 2024 eHealth Indicator Study reports an average composite score of 79% for citizen access to electronic health records.²

Interoperability is accelerating. The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation, officially published on 5 March 2025 and entering into force on 26 March 2025, establishes a harmonised legal and technical framework for EHR systems across all EU Member States.³ The EHDS sets a progressive timeline: the Commission must adopt implementing acts by March 2027, with full obligations phasing in through 2029.⁴

Yet hospitals and vendors still struggle to turn that data into timely, actionable clinical decision support inside the workflow. Custom integrations, one-off CDS logic, and fragmented UX keep adding cost and complexity while the human cost remains staggering:

•   According to the European Medicines Agency, 18.7% to 56% of all adverse events among hospitalised patients result from medication errors⁵

•   In the UK alone, there are approximately 237 million medication errors per year, with 66 million potentially clinically significant⁶

•   The WHO estimates the annual global cost of medication errors at $42 billion USD⁷

This is exactly where CDS Hooks clinical decision support comes in: a standard way for EHRs and clinical applications to invoke external CDS services at key moments in the workflow, using modern REST/JSON APIs grounded in FHIR.⁸

For EHR and health IT vendors, CDS Hooks is not just a technical feature—it's a strategic integration pattern that lets you add or outsource clinical intelligence without rebuilding custom plumbing for every customer and every EHR.

What are CDS Hooks? A Plain-Language View for Product and Tech Leaders

The CDS Hooks specification describes how a CDS client (typically an EHR) and a CDS service (for example, a medication decision support engine) communicate using JSON over HTTPS.⁸ Launched by the SMART team, it is now an HL7 Standard for Trial Use (STU2), actively maintained by the HL7 Clinical Decision Support Work Group.⁹

Hooks = Workflow Events

"Hooks" are named events in the clinical workflow that trigger clinical decision support. The official CDS Hooks Library includes standardised hooks such as:

•   patient-view — opening a patient chart

•   order-select — selecting a medication or other order

•   order-sign — signing the order

•   encounter-start — starting a consultation or admission

When such an event occurs, the EHR sends a CDS Hooks request to one or more CDS services.

Context, Prefetch and FHIR

The request contains: context (key information about what is happening — patient, user, encounter, selected order) and an optional prefetch block — FHIR resources (e.g., Patient, MedicationRequest, Observation) that the CDS service is likely to need.¹⁰ This keeps the interaction efficient and API-driven, instead of exposing the entire EHR database.

Cards = What Clinicians See

The CDS service returns one or more "cards". These can contain:

•   Informational messages: risk scores, guideline reminders

•   Warnings and alerts: drug interactions, contraindications

•   Suggestions: recommended alternatives or orders

•   Links or app launches: launch a SMART on FHIR app for deeper interaction

From a product perspective, cards are the UI contract: you control how CDS advice appears in your EHR, while the external CDS engine focuses on the clinical logic.

Is CDS Hooks just a trend? Evidence from standards and the ecosystem

Standards Maturity

CDS Hooks was first balloted in HL7 in 2018 as a way to provision CDS through web services inside EHR workflows. The current specification (STU2 Release 2) is published by HL7, and the CDS Hooks Library maintains a set of standard workflow hooks used in industry implementations. In other words: the spec is no longer experimental but remains flexible enough for vendors to innovate.

EHR and API Ecosystem Growth

The app ecosystem around EHRs has grown rapidly. A JAMIA study found that unique apps in certified health IT galleries increased from 600 to 734 (+22%) over the study period, with FHIR adoption becoming the default for new integrations.¹¹ This growth signals a clear pattern: EHRs are increasingly becoming platforms, and FHIR plus CDS Hooks are part of the native language of that platform economy.

EHR Vendor Adoption

CDS Hooks is supported by major EHR vendors worldwide, including Epic, Oracle Health (Cerner), Allscripts, and athenahealth.¹² In Europe, leading health IT vendors are moving towards FHIR-based interoperability in preparation for EHDS compliance. Key European EHR vendors include:

•   Dedalus (Italy) — significant presence in France, Germany, and across Southern Europe

•   CompuGroup Medical (CGM) (Germany) — major vendor in DACH region

•   NEXUS AG (Germany), Meierhofer — presence in German-speaking markets

•   Cambio, Sectra, DIPS, Systematic — Nordic region vendors

•   Softway Medical, Maincare, Cegedim Santé — major players in France

•   TPP, System C, EMIS — established vendors in the UK

HL7 Europe has published new FHIR Implementation Guides specifically designed to support the European Health Data Space, with STU 1.0 releases for both FHIR R4 and R5 in late October 2025.¹³ This positions FHIR — and by extension CDS Hooks — as core infrastructure for European health IT.

Regulatory Recognition

European regulators are driving standards adoption. The EHDS regulation mandates that EHR systems meet strict interoperability and security certification requirements. FHIR has been explicitly identified as a key standard for data exchange, with the European Commission's implementing acts expected by March 2027.¹⁴

Bottom line: CDS Hooks is not a passing buzzword — it is increasingly recognised as a key mechanism for standards-based clinical decision support inside EHRs, with regulatory backing in Europe and widespread vendor adoption.

How CDS Hooks Powers Clinical Decision Support in the EHR

The true value of CDS Hooks becomes evident when mapped to actual clinical workflows. It moves beyond static alerts to provide context-aware intelligence exactly when it's needed.

1. patient-view: Context-Aware Insights at Chart Open

When a clinician opens a patient chart, the EHR triggers a patient-view hook. It sends the patient context (patient ID, user ID, encounter) and optional FHIR pre-fetched data (problem list, current medications, recent labs). A CDS service instantly returns cards such as:

•   Risk summaries (e.g., anticoagulation risk, high-risk medications in elderly patients)

•   Gaps in care (e.g., missing lab monitoring, overdue follow-up)

2. order-select and order-sign: Medication Safety at the Point of Prescribing

These are the hooks with the most direct impact on medication safety. When a prescriber selects or signs a medication order, the EHR can invoke CDS services that analyse the proposed medication against the patient's current therapy, allergies, diagnoses, renal function, and more.

Studies consistently show that well-implemented CDS at the prescribing stage dramatically reduces errors. A systematic review found that transitioning from paper-based ordering to CPOE with CDS in ICUs was associated with an 85% reduction in medication prescribing errors.¹⁵ Research into contextualized drug-drug interaction algorithms demonstrates the possibility of achieving more than 50% alert reduction while maintaining safety through smarter, more targeted alerting.¹⁶

3. encounter-start: Admission Review and Risk Assessment

When a patient encounter begins, CDS services can immediately flag medication reconciliation needs, highlight high-risk patients requiring pharmacy review, or surface admission-specific protocols.

Why This Matters for Health IT Vendors

From an EHR product strategy perspective, CDS Hooks offers several compelling advantages:

•   Fewer bespoke integrations: Instead of building custom APIs for every CDS vendor or use case, you expose one standard interface

•   Decoupled CDS logic: External services can update their clinical logic (guidelines, drug databases, algorithms) without requiring EHR code changes

•   EHDS and regulatory alignment: Adopting FHIR-based standards like CDS Hooks positions your product for European regulatory compliance and cross-border interoperability

•   International scalability: CDS Hooks lets you offer the same integration pattern across markets, reducing localisation costs

Medication-Focused CDS: Where Posos Fits

Why Medication Safety Deserves Special Attention

Medication errors occur at every stage of the medication use process, but prescribing is where CDS can have the greatest impact:

1. Errors more likely to result in harm occur most frequently at the prescribing (56%) and administering (34%) stages in the hospital setting¹⁷

2. Evidence shows that 50-70% of medication-related harm can be prevented through comprehensive systematic approaches¹⁸

Posos as a CDS Service Behind Your Hooks

Posos provides a medication decision support engine exposed through APIs, designed to analyse prescriptions and patient context in real time: drug interactions, contraindications, dosage issues, and more.

When you wire this engine into your EHR or prescribing system via CDS Hooks, you can:

•   Use order-select to check a proposed medication against current therapy and patient factors before it's finalised

•   Use order-sign to run a final high-sensitivity safety check across the whole prescription

•   Use patient-view or encounter-start to surface medication risks and review needs when a chart or encounter opens

The Integration Flow

3. The EHR fires a hook when the relevant event occurs

4. It sends the necessary context and FHIR resources

5. The Posos API, acting as a CDS Hooks-compatible service, analyses the data

6. It returns cards with clear, actionable information and, where useful, links to richer explanations

Because the integration uses standard CDS Hooks interactions, you don't have to reinvent the integration model for each EHR or customer; you can focus on product design and go-to-market.

Questions Every Clinical Software Leader Should Ask

If you are responsible for the roadmap of an EHR, prescribing system, or other clinical software, consider these strategic questions:

7. Where in our workflows would CDS Hooks add the most value? Chart opening, medication ordering, admission, discharge, referral?

8. Which parts of CDS do you need to own, and where does it make sense to partner? General UX vs. deep medication expertise, for example.

9. Are we ready to adopt a standards-based CDS architecture (FHIR + CDS Hooks) that can scale across markets and EHRs?

CDS Hooks is not just a technical choice. It's a way to industrialise how you deliver clinical intelligence in your product.

Conclusion: The Future Is Standards-Based CDS

The healthcare technology landscape is converging on interoperability standards. With the EHDS regulation now in force and implementing acts expected by March 2027, and with FHIR firmly established as the backbone of health data exchange, the window for proprietary-only approaches is closing.

CDS Hooks offers a proven, vendor-agnostic mechanism to embed clinical decision support — especially medication safety — directly into clinical workflows. For health IT vendors, it represents both a technical architecture and a strategic positioning: standards-based, scalable, and aligned with where the European and global markets are heading.

For medication safety specifically, partnering with a CDS Hooks-compatible API like Posos allows you to bring advanced prescription analysis into your EHR or clinical system, with a standards-based integration that your customers' CIOs and CMIOs can understand and trust.

Ready to explore how Posos can power your medication CDS? Contact our integration team to discuss your CDS Hooks implementation.

Sources

¹ WHO Europe (2023). Share of EHR use in health care in European countries in 2022, by care level. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/m/item/key-facts-about-medication-errors-mes-in-the-who-european-region

² European Commission (2024). Digital Decade 2024: eHealth Indicator Study. EU27 average composite score. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade-2024-ehealth-indicator-study

³ European Commission (2025). European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS). Official Journal of the EU, 5 March 2025, entered into force 26 March 2025. https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en

⁴ European Commission (2025). EHDS Timeline: Commission to adopt implementing acts by March 2027, obligations phasing through 2029. https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en

⁵ European Medicines Agency (2015). Safer use of medicines by preventing medication errors. 18.7-56% of adverse events among hospitalised patients. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/safer-use-medicines-preventing-medication-errors

⁶ Elliott RA et al. (2021). Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 237 million errors, 66 million potentially clinically significant. https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/30/2/96

⁷ WHO (2017). Medication Without Harm: Global Patient Safety Challenge. $42 billion annual global cost. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.6

⁸ CDS Hooks Specification. HL7 Cross-Paradigm Specification: CDS Hooks STU2. https://cds-hooks.hl7.org/

⁹ HL7 CDS Work Group. CDS Hooks STU2 maintained by HL7 Clinical Decision Support Work Group. https://confluence.hl7.org/display/CDS/CDS+Hooks

¹⁰ CDS Hooks Specification. Prefetch and Context documentation. https://cds-hooks.org/

¹¹ JAMIA (2021). The ecosystem of apps and software integrated with certified health information technology. Apps increased from 600 to 734 (+22%). https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/28/11/2379/6375082

¹² Trisotech (2024). CDS Hooks Standard. Support in Epic, Cerner, Allscripts, athenahealth. https://www.trisotech.com/cds-hooks/

¹³ HL7 Europe (2025). FHIR Implementation Guides for EHDS, STU 1.0 for R4 and R5. Generated 26 October 2025. https://www.hl7europe.org/

¹⁴ European Commission. EHDS implementing acts timeline: March 2027 for key implementing acts. https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en

¹⁵ Prgomet M et al. (2017). Impact of commercial CPOE and CDSSs on medication errors in ICUs: systematic review and meta-analysis. 85% reduction in prescribing errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28395016/

¹⁶ AHRQ Digital Healthcare Research. Meaningful Drug Interaction Alerts. >50% alert reduction with contextualized DDI algorithms. https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/meaningful-drug-interaction-alerts

¹⁷ Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2014). Medication Errors: What Is Their Impact? Prescribing (56%) and administering (34%) stages. https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(14)00567-9/fulltext

¹⁸ WHO (2022). Key Facts About Medication Errors. 50-70.2% of medication-related harm can be prevented. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/librariesprovider2/country-sites/medication-error-wpsd-final.pdf

‍